lottobrazerzkidai.blogg.se

1. XEON QUICKSYNC 1080P
2. XEON QUICKSYNC SOFTWARE
3. XEON QUICKSYNC CODE
4. XEON QUICKSYNC PC
5. XEON QUICKSYNC WINDOWS

Normal GPU methods also cannot be used because a single lightweight GPU thread isn't effective processing one GOP and you can't use multiple GPU threads per GOP because of the algorithm.

XEON QUICKSYNC SOFTWARE

In theory each GOP can be processed separately, and most software will dispatch those to multiple cores, but there are often hundreds or thousands of GOPs in a file so 8 cores vs 12 cores doesn't make much difference. The processing within each GOP cannot be parallelized due to the sequential algorithm. You can't meaningfully accelerate long-GOP encode/decode (like H264 or H265) with normal CPU methods or with normal GPU parallel methods. On HEVC/H265 I haven't tested that but HEVC is much more compute-intensive than H264 and without some kind of hardware acceleration I'd expect it to be quite sluggish. The only way to get that much speed increase is hardware acceleration.

XEON QUICKSYNC 1080P

In my tests the entry-level 8-core Vega 56 iMac Pro was about 3x faster at encoding 1080p H264 video than a top-spec 12-core D700 Mac Pro. It's definitely not just more/faster CPU cores. It's very likely the iMac Pro has some kind of hardware acceleration and FCPX is using that, at least for 1080p H264. HandBrake would also have to add API calls to AMD's UVD/VCE logic. Like VLC even if HandBrake eventually added Quick Sync calls to released builds, if the iMP or future Mac Pro don't have Quick Sync it would not help.

XEON QUICKSYNC CODE

There is currently no support for Quick Sync on Mac versions, although there's an experimental source code tree you theoretically could build yourself using xcode. I'm not sure what the chance of that happening is.Ī similar situation exists with HandBrake. In that case VLC would have to add calls to AMD's UVD/VCE logic. However even if VLC adds this it might not help on an iMP (or future Mac Pro) if those don't have Quick Sync. The current Mac VLC version is 2.2.8, so ver. Re VLC, it does not currently use Quick Sync on Mac, but they plan to add this (playback only) for version 3. Yes that implies Apple is using some kind of hardware acceleration on the iMP, whether that be a custom Xeon with Quick Sync or they are calling the decode/encode logic in AMD's GPU, called UVD and VCE. This speed boost is what Edius tends to favor more than the core count.I assume you mean it plays back smoothly with low CPU load using QuickTime Player 10 running on High Sierra on an iMP? XEON processors are more about parallel processing of multiple processes which is why they tend to have a higher core count (think computer servers being accessed by many people and softwares at the same time), where as i3/i5/i7/i9 tend to focus on doing fewer things at the same time, but doing them at a faster speed. This is why your i3 seems better, as it has a clock speed of 3.6GHz. It has a clock speed of 2.2GHz, but Edius tends to perform a lot better with faster clock speeds. So far all we know is "Xeon E5-2699 v4/64GB with GTX1080 Ti", but my initial reaction to that is that your CPU is probably too slow.

XEON QUICKSYNC WINDOWS

Things like, CPU, GPU, Motherboard, RAM, Storage Configuration, source file type/codec, Windows Version, Edius version, among other things can help. Regarding the performance of you Xeon system, you will need to provide some information about the system for people to give you recommendations. A quick forum search will reveal a lot more information than I have posted here. These questions have been asked many times on the forum. Some softwares can also use the nVidia GPU's nvenc functions for the same acceleration purpose that Edius uses the Intel GPU for. You can use a software encoder such as Handbrake, amongst others, by exporting an HQX file and using it as the Handbrake source. Most XEON's, don't have the CPU core, so you can't encode H265 directly from Edius on those systems. Is there any way to improve the performance on my primary system?Ĭan I assume that a CPU with Intel Quicksync is required for Edius HEVC output?Yes, Edius requires an Intel CPU with an H265/HEVC compatible Quicksync GPU core for direct H265 encodes. Not only the responsiveness was worse, I even got the message "Cannot export files due to unavailability of hardware encoder". However, when I used the same software on my primary system (a Xeon E5-2699 v4/64GB with GTX1080 Ti), the overall performance was significantly downgraded. The rendering of 10-bit HEVC was fast and pretty.

XEON QUICKSYNC PC

I was amazed and well impressed with the unbelievable performance on my secondary PC (a plain i3-8100/16GB without any add-on graphics card).